Comment on AI agents wrong ~70% of time: Carnegie Mellon study

• jsomae@lemmy.ml ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

  Hitler liked to paint, doesn’t make painting wrong. The fact that big tech is pushing AI isn’t evidence against the utility of AI.

  That common parlance is to call machine learning “AI” these days doesn’t matter to me in the slightest. Do you have a definition of “intelligence”? Do you object when pathfinding is called AI? Or STRIPS? Or bots in a video game? Dare I say it, the main difference between those AIs and LLMs is their generality – so why not just call it GAI at this point tbh. This is a question of semantics so it really doesn’t matter to the deeper question. Doesn’t matter if you call it AI or not, LLMs work the same way either way.

  source

  • outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

    Semantics, of course, famously never matter.

    source

    • jsomae@lemmy.ml ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

      yeah.

      source
• Honytawk@feddit.nl ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

  And your pushing a hate train you don’t understand.

  Seems like you are even less than 30% useful. And that is mainly because you can be used as fertilizer.

  source