Comment on Study Finds LLMs Biased Against Men in Hiring
catty@lemmy.world 5 days agoAt least where I’m from it’s pretty well known that girls outperform boys in school, probably because their brains develop slightly faster in some ways useful to perform in a class room.
At least where I’m from, it’s pretty well know that the education system is better suited to girls than boys, probably because it needs a reform.
This could give women a head start and very well lead to them on average performing better in work life, until they are forced to choose between careers and families while they partners continue to advance their careers at full speed not worrying about being pregnant.
To paraphrase: women can get pregnant and can’t work. It’s the man’s fault. It isn’t the extreme and aggressive pandering to feminism that gives women a “head start”, but because they’re better educated.
we should stop pretending language models make intelligent considerations about anything. LLMs trained on the texts we produce create the opposite bias of what we observe in society
So you’re stating that LLMs are making dumb decisions by recommending women over men. Lol
cabbage@piefed.social 5 days ago
I didn't say it doesn't, clearly there's a problem when half the population is systematically favoured.
Where the fuck did I say that it's the man's fault? It's a societal problem, doesn't mean it's anybody's fault.
I'm the first to criticize corporate feminism (just like greenwashing and pride washing), but I suspect feminist messaging appeals to women because they are sick of the patriarchy, not because they are programmed by marketing agencies. The fuck are you on about.
catty@lemmy.world 5 days ago
Lol, again, it’s the men’s fault.
cabbage@piefed.social 5 days ago
It's not men against women, it's people against billionaires.
It's not the fact that these people are men that I take issue with, it's that they are hypocrites trying to capitalize of feminist sentiments without making any actual effort towards real change.