Comment on Ethical frameworks are detrimental to Scientific Study because Science is by nature unethical.

• Arkouda@lemmy.ca ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

  If people aren’t suppose to discuss and possibly disagree, why post?

  I am open to discussion and disagreement. Look around the thread and tell me how many opening comments you see promoting discussion or civil disagreement.

  What do you think is the purpose of the showerthoughts community?

  To share “Shower thoughts”.

  Crazy concept I know.

  source

  • Acamon@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

    I see a bunch of people posting civil and reasonable issues with the thinking behind your shower thought, and then you replying in an immature and disingenuous manner. I think the contrasting upvotes / downvotes in your comments vs everyone elses suggests that my interpretation is shared by the wider community.

    I almost didn’t comment because I thought from your behaviour it was obvious trolling, and there’s no point reasoning with trolls. But looking through your post history, you seem like you’re generally posting on good faith, so I thought I’d try and explain that you do not need to react so defensively to legitamate discussion and disagreement.

    A shower thought doesn’t need to be factually correct to be interesting, but when you post a pretty extreme take on a serious and sensitive subject, it isn’t surprising that people are going to clarify where you’ve gone wrong.

    source

    • Arkouda@lemmy.ca ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

      This isn’t a serious or sensitive topic, and I engaged people as they engaged me. If you actually looked at the thread you would see me engage like a jerk when people engaged me in bad faith, and engaged in good faith conversation with those who engaged in good faith.

      Go police someone else. I never asked for your opinion.

      source