www.youtube.com/watch?v=upELI0HmzHc&t=417
3d honeycomb is insanely slow and only strong in 1 direction as opposed to all directions like gyroid.
Comment on Gyroid infil appreciation post
Cobrachicken@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Did you probably happen to compare it to 3d honeycomb? Quite pleased with that meself.
JustEnoughDucks@feddit.nl 1 year ago
PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks [bot] 1 year ago
Here is an alternative Piped link(s): piped.video/watch?v=upELI0HmzHc&
Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.
I’m open-source, check me out at GitHub.
FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 1 year ago
The only advantage 3d honeycomb has is speed.
3dh Is directional, has stress points, and has less fluid transitions between changing layers.
Unless you’re absolutely in a hurry, it’s easily the best infill.
JustEnoughDucks@feddit.nl 1 year ago
That is literally its biggest disandadvantage lol.
www.youtube.com/watch?v=upELI0HmzHc&t=417
3D neycomb is insanely slow. It takes like double or triple the time and is super stressful on the printer because of very high accelerations.
Pretty much its only use of honeycomb seems to be making the absolute strongest prints in compression strength. 3D honeycomb is slightly better, but it is essentially the master of none. Line and rectilinear have the best surface, cubic and gyroid have the best transverse strength. Triangle has as good of compression strength and transverse strength as honeycomb and better than 3D honeycomb while taking a fraction of the time to print.
Honeycomb is probably one of the worst “popular” infills.
PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks [bot] 1 year ago
Here is an alternative Piped link(s): piped.video/watch?v=upELI0HmzHc&
Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.
I’m open-source, check me out at GitHub.
Jtskywalker@lemm.ee 1 year ago
I haven’t tried that one yet. I don’t see that one in Cura - is that in prusa slicer?
thisbenzingring@lemmy.sdf.org 1 year ago
It’s available in the Prusa Slicer