Comment on Without the precursor of Spirituality and Religion, there can be no morality.
Lumidaub@feddit.org 1 month agoI have made my point, you just don’t want to accept it.
Comment on Without the precursor of Spirituality and Religion, there can be no morality.
Lumidaub@feddit.org 1 month agoI have made my point, you just don’t want to accept it.
Arkouda@lemmy.ca 1 month ago
You haven’t made a single point. You have argued for “inherent” morality, which is bunk.
When I have tried to clarify, you refuse to answer questions.
So again, state your point in full below or jog on because I don’t even think you understand the point I have made quite clear and which you refuse to acknowledge by dodging my questions and points.
Lumidaub@feddit.org 1 month ago
I have given an alternative explanation for the existence of morality which is in line with current science, such as our understanding of evolution. This, at the very least, disproves your notion that there is no other explanation for morality than religion and spirituality. It may not prove that religion and spirituality ISN’T the explanation, if that makes you happy. I refuse to go into broader topics such as the entirety of human behaviour.
Arkouda@lemmy.ca 1 month ago
Empathy isn’t inherent, and that is not current science.
Take care.
OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca 5 weeks ago
Yes it is, on both accounts
www.sciencedirect.com/…/S0163638311000506