Dafuq.
This is the craziest reaction to knowledge
Knowing something new we didn’t before means… We know more now.
Stop trying to politicize this.
Bosht@lemmy.world 4 days ago
Jesus they will release any study to try and smear electric. It’s the same argument as cigs vs vapes. Yes they’re both bad and not the best solution, but one is obviously better than the other. Plus how are they separating contamination of the charging stations from any other area where normal ass cars operate. There’s just as much of a chance if not more that those particles are from the gas vehicles driving around, and not something specific to the chargers.
douglasg14b@lemmy.world 4 days ago
lime@feddit.nu 3 days ago
i don’t know if i would take this study as “knowledge”. that map of the us? it’s fake. reading the study, they were only measuring in one county. the error bars overlap enough that this could all be errors.
question is, why publish it if it is so obviously (and willfully) wrong?
VicksVaporBBQrub@sh.itjust.works 4 days ago
They’re not separating data throughly. Researcher Yifang Zhu, over many publishings, mainly gathers and publishes raw findings. Such as… (summarizing) “Children are at risk due to immature respiratory systems and faster breathing rates… by traveling in diesel powered school buses in my South Texas study.”
Source- scholar.google.com/citations?view_op=view_citatio…