Fire works on Android and is meant to do basically the same thing. I saw someone post it in another thread, but haven’t explored it in depth.
Comment on ICEBlock climbs to the top of the App Store charts after officials slam it
ScrambledEggs@lazysoci.al 2 days ago
Is there an android version?
swelter_spark@reddthat.com 1 day ago
belouve@infosec.pub 2 days ago
There is not and it is due to privacy implications. You can read more on their site about it and ALSO, there are fake Android apps of this that they caution you to not install. As of now, there is no Android version and unlikely unless Android fixes the way notifications work to not have any account or privacy issues for such an app.
dataprolet@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 days ago
This is not true. bsky.app/profile/grapheneos.org/…/3lt2prfb2vk2r
Enkimaru@lemmy.world 1 day ago
Well, who knows what is true and what not. I never knew that Push Notifications go via Apple, and not via the network operator. Definitely wrong is GraphenOS’s claim that Android does not allow access to the device id. Of course it does. For what reason would the ID exist if it does not? No idea if you need it for a FB message/notification though.
Ulrich@feddit.org 1 day ago
Lots of people do.
That’s not what it says.
There has to be a way for Google/Apple to know which device to send the notif to.
Arcane2077@sh.itjust.works 2 days ago
Which part? Are you saying they have made an android version?
Zak@lemmy.world 2 days ago
The link in the comment you’re replying to says which part is not true, but since you seem more willing to comment than to click a link and read, I’ll summarize:
The part about the Apple Push Notification service requiring less information that can identify an individual user than Google’s Firebase Cloud Messaging is not true. Both use a similar token system. Furthermore, it is possible to build android apps with notifications that do not use FCM.
dubyakay@lemmy.ca 2 days ago
No, they are saying that Android and Apple both have a privacy issue on the same level.
Empricorn@feddit.nl 2 days ago
Incompetence is not a “privacy implication”. You think Apple servers are beyond reach of US warrants?