Perot did pretty well on his runs iirc. But I don’t think he’s the one you were talking about.
Comment on YSK that 158 families made up 50% of all US Presidential Campaign Spending
Eyekaytee@aussie.zone 17 hours ago
wasn’t there some billionaire that ran for president, spent hundreds of millions and got like <1% of the vote?
Stern@lemmy.world 16 hours ago
Eyekaytee@aussie.zone 16 hours ago
Yep sorry it was Michael Bloomberg
awesomesauce309@midwest.social 16 hours ago
Yeah Michael Bloomberg bought his way through the rest of the primary debates then when it came time for the primary vote nobody wanted him.
Eyekaytee@aussie.zone 16 hours ago
That’s the one!
nbcnews.com/…/bloomberg-spent-nearly-1-billion-hi…
So my next question is:
Just how effective is advertising in the presidential race when you can spend a billion and go no where?
awesomesauce309@midwest.social 15 hours ago
Conservatives vote out of fear. They lie awake at night terrified of their son having to play sports agains a trans boy. Advertising these moron fears is a lot easier than advertising a plan to make things better. But also Michael Bloomberg had no plan to make things better, at least for us lowly constituents.
acockworkorange@mander.xyz 15 hours ago
He was just dumb. He spent unwisely. The best things in life are free. Like the support of moguls like Murdoch from Fox News.