Why does scale matter? If it was only 50k kids daily would it change your mind?
Are there graphic gore and violence websites that kids are frequenting by the millions daily?
KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 month ago
FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 1 month ago
Putting it in the same perspective as the number that access porn.
KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 month ago
So it’s a scale problem for you? What number is acceptable?
FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 1 month ago
No, it’s not just a scale problem, but to even suggest that kids looking at graphic violence videos on YouTube etc is as prevalent as or as big of an issue as kids looking at porn is absurd. There are studies galore linking the consumption of porn in children to all sorts of behavioural issue, and studies showing that it’s increasing dramatically.
I have nothing against porn, I don’t think it should be censored or banned or anything - but age restrictions done properly (ie securely and privately) are long overdue.
And before you say it - yes, I think the same should apply to other not-suitable-for-kids content like extreme violence, vulgarity, etc.
surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Yes. Youtube. Cable TV. Every streaming service.
FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 1 month ago
All have age warnings and restrictions.
surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 1 month ago
So does pornhub.
FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 1 month ago
Warning yes, restrictions no.
BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world 1 month ago
YouTube, Netflix, Hulu, Peacock, Disney+, Max, etc. And that’s before we get into the bad faith false equivalence of comparing violence to nudity and sexuality. One is a natural and beautiful part of life, the other is literally violence.
FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 1 month ago
And also huge lols at saying porn is just nudity and sexuality
FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 1 month ago
Those all have age rating systems in place lol.
BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Wow, you didn’t just move the goalpost, you changed the sport.
FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 1 month ago
How do you figure? The argument is that porn shouldn’t have age restrictions cause violence on tv and streaming media doesn’t…….but I pointed out that they does have age restrictions.
How is that “changing the sport”? What did you think we were discussing?
semperverus@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Movies, books, and video games all have a decently sizeable amount, yea. Especially the Bible.
FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 1 month ago
Movies already have ratings systems and age checks.
Books at book stores don’t generally have graphic violence and gore.
The bible is just text, there’s no gore or violence that kids can see.
semperverus@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Lol.
You realize words still count right?
I repeat the above.
FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 1 month ago
No, words don’t count as graphic violence lol. Graphic violence is defined as being in visual media, not written.
thedruid@lemmy.world 1 month ago
What’s funny is the Bible is worse than most of the books that are banned as far as depravity goes.
entropicdrift@lemmy.sdf.org 1 month ago
…seriously? Go read The Boys or Chainsaw Man or Gantz
SmilingSolaris@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Nah bro didn’t you see his other reply? Words aren’t graphic in any way ever. It’s in the word. Graphic. There’s no graphics in books, it don’t have a graphics card!