Comment on Meta wins artificial intelligence copyright case in blow to authors
technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 20 hours agoIt depends on your definition of “is”. In reality it depends on the work and how it’s transformed. But legally it’s whatever benefits capital (aka your boss).
drmoose@lemmy.world 20 hours ago
Ok so if I don’t generate capital from it theres no crime? You can see how the original argument that all copying is copyright breach. Then you can infinitely dig into this - is my monitor copying pixels on my screen copying? What about the browser cache? So copyright can only be argued from the pov that breach has to be capital generating.