Comment on Meta wins artificial intelligence copyright case in blow to authors
technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 weeks agoIt depends on your definition of “is”. In reality it depends on the work and how it’s transformed. But legally it’s whatever benefits capital (aka your boss).
drmoose@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
Ok so if I don’t generate capital from it theres no crime? You can see how the original argument that all copying is copyright breach. Then you can infinitely dig into this - is my monitor copying pixels on my screen copying? What about the browser cache? So copyright can only be argued from the pov that breach has to be capital generating.