Comment on A fake Facebook event disguised as a math problem has been one of its top posts for 6 months
Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world 1 day agoCan you explain how that is? Like with an example?
Comment on A fake Facebook event disguised as a math problem has been one of its top posts for 6 months
Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world 1 day agoCan you explain how that is? Like with an example?
SmartmanApps@programming.dev 20 hours ago
I’m not sure what you’re asking about. Explain what with an example?
No it isn’t. It’s a tool for calculating things, with syntax rules. We even have rules around how to say it when speaking.
And that something is the Laws of the Universe. 1+1=2, F=ma, etc.
Image
Image
Image
You won’t find the word “statement” used in Maths textbooks. I’m guessing you’re referring to Expressions.
Image
Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world 20 hours ago
Those rules are based on axioms which are used to create statements which are used within proofs. As far as I know statements are pretty common and are a foundational part of all math.
Defining math as a language though is also going to be pointless here. It’s not really a yes or no thing. I’ll say it is a language but sure it’s arguable.
And again laws are created using statements. I have plenty of textbooks that contain “statements”
SmartmanApps@programming.dev 19 hours ago
Nope! The order of operations rules come from the proof of the definitions in the first place. 3x4=3+3+3+3 by definition, therefore if you don’t do the multiplication first in 2+3x4 you get a wrong answer (having changed the multiplicand).
And yet you’ve not been able to quote a Maths textbook using that word.
Expressions are.
It’s really a no thing.
Not the Laws of Maths. e.g. The Distributive Law is expressed with the identity a(b+c)=(ab+ac). An identity is a special type of equation. We have…
Numerals
Pronumerals
Expressions
Equations (or Formula)
Identities
No statements. Everything is precisely defined in Maths, everything has one meaning only.
Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world 19 hours ago
What is this answer
X^2=4