Comment on You're not alone: This email from Google's Gemini team is concerning

• jjjalljs@ttrpg.network ⁨3⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

  Well, in this example, the information provided by the AI was simply wrong. If it had done the traditional search method of pointing to the organization’s website where they had the hours listed, it would have worked fine.

  This idea that “we’re all entitled to our opinion” is nonsense. That’s for when you’re a child and the topic is what flavor Jelly Bean you like. It’s not for like policy or things that matter. You can’t just “it’s my opinion” your way through “this algorithm is O(n^2) but I like it better than O(n) so I’m going to use it for my big website”. Or more on topic, you can’t use it for “these results are wrong but I like them better”

  source

  • Tja@programming.dev ⁨3⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

    Traditional search often is also wrong, showing some 3rd party website or a link farm.

    With AI search I get a summary AND the result list, so I have more info to make a decision.

    source

    • jjjalljs@ttrpg.network ⁨3⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

      Well, yes, Google has been becoming shittier for years as they prioritize ads and fail to deal with SEO slop. You have to know what’s a good source, but that was true even when we were doing research in libraries.

      The AI summary is making the problem worse. The information it provides is not trustworthy. It also deprives site owners from traffic. It’s really bad on like every metric.

      source

      • Tja@programming.dev ⁨3⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

        The AI summary is additive, I don’t see how it makes it worse. I find it useful to save time and it’s right in most cases, if I need something of vital importance (like the opening time for a shop) I don’t use search results anyway, I go to maps where I expect to find a link to their official website (not trusting the opening hours on maps either).

        source

        • -> View More Comments