They‘ll keep building more coal power plants in the global south and export coal. There‘s a lot of money to be made.
DaddleDew@lemmy.world 1 day ago
Good on them. The earlier they can shut down those coal plants, the better.
CosmoNova@lemmy.world 1 day ago
finitebanjo@lemmy.world 22 hours ago
They’re also actually still building more coal power in mainland China.
Mihies@programming.dev 1 day ago
Yep, solar is awesome when you have coal and gas power plants, not so much when you have nuclear ones.
ByteJunk@lemmy.world 1 day ago
How idiotic.
Mihies@programming.dev 1 day ago
Do explain, I’m all ears.
SmackemWittadic@lemmy.world 1 day ago
I think they don’t get that your comment is fighting the same fight by being pro solar & anti coal/gas, with the only difference being that your comment is also pro nuclear power.
ByteJunk@lemmy.world 1 day ago
No. I type less.
FishFace@lemmy.world 1 day ago
Solar and nuclear work just fine together. Nuclear is expensive (and most cost effective if kept running all the time, rather than switched on and off) but it reduces the cost of solar (lower proportion of solar means you don’t need as much storage) and hedges against bad weather.
Mihies@programming.dev 1 day ago
You can’t just switch it off and on. It runs at more or less full power all the time. So tell me, at what power is that taking into consideration that sun doesn’t shine during night + mornings and evenings when days are short or cloudy?
FishFace@lemmy.world 1 day ago
I don’t understand what you’re asking, sorry.
catsarebadpeople@sh.itjust.works 18 hours ago
???
tostiman@sh.itjust.works 1 day ago
Huh? No
Wanderer@lemm.ee 8 hours ago
They are going to keep those coal plants as back up but the amount they use then is decreasing.
At the same time they are rapidly moving transport into electricity and they are growing their electrical demand.
This year should be the tipping point where coal and oil usage drops. Capacity and number of coal is meaningless.