We don’t.
Pretty bold claim. Who can we trust in this scenario? How do we trust you?
flightyhobler@lemmy.world 8 months ago
Canigou@jlai.lu 1 week ago
Fair, but you are wrong about me. Explained it in an other answer higher in the comments.
victorz@lemmy.world 8 months ago
Oh shit 😆👍 Thanks for the clarity. I knew my gut feeling was tingling in the right frequency in this case.
phoenixz@lemmy.ca 8 months ago
Well you can check the site yourself, that ain’t too hard to do
victorz@lemmy.world 8 months ago
I did, and now I did again. I don’t see/understand any clues to it being a “fake website” after browsing around and looking at various pages and articles. 🤷♂️ Can somebody help me understand? (Besides the condescending “just look at it”, thanks!)
Canigou@jlai.lu 1 week ago
Fake might have been a poor choice of word. I just found it extremely biased and it had very few articles when this one was published. On their footers it reads “FuelArc News is your unbiased source for American automotive news.” When an unbiased view is waived around, I don’t consider it a very good sign toward actuality.
Canigou@jlai.lu 1 week ago
I’m just pointing to the fishiness of the source. I am in no way a Tesla fan. I think the individual electric car is a bad solution to air pollution and global warming. Got a bit more into detail higher up in the comments.