Yeah but contrary to these listed, the judge know the guardian is a newspaper, they shouldn’t be able to make him/her afraid in the same way they did.
Yeah but contrary to these listed, the judge know the guardian is a newspaper, they shouldn’t be able to make him/her afraid in the same way they did.
Ulrich@feddit.org 9 hours ago
The logic does not check out. Signal isn’t going to integrate a news section and then suddenly be exempt from this regulation.
Diurnambule@jlai.lu 7 hours ago
It show you didn’t read, I am explaining the article piece by piece. They used the lost a gave you to convince a judge it was a terrorist behavior. It is not forbidden to crypt things. And they would not have been able to convince a judge the news application guardian is a terrorist tool.
Ulrich@feddit.org 7 hours ago
I read the entire thing. I don’t need it explained to me. It’s clear just by looking at it that they’re targeting all encrypted communications.
I think it’s pretty obvious that they could.