I don’t know everything. Just because it’s not explicitly listed today doesn’t mean it won’t be tomorrow. This was just created yesterday. And it does the same thing that all of those listed apps do: facilitates private communication.
I don’t know everything. Just because it’s not explicitly listed today doesn’t mean it won’t be tomorrow. This was just created yesterday. And it does the same thing that all of those listed apps do: facilitates private communication.
Diurnambule@jlai.lu 15 hours ago
Yeah but contrary to these listed, the judge know the guardian is a newspaper, they shouldn’t be able to make him/her afraid in the same way they did.
Ulrich@feddit.org 14 hours ago
The logic does not check out. Signal isn’t going to integrate a news section and then suddenly be exempt from this regulation.
Diurnambule@jlai.lu 12 hours ago
It show you didn’t read, I am explaining the article piece by piece. They used the lost a gave you to convince a judge it was a terrorist behavior. It is not forbidden to crypt things. And they would not have been able to convince a judge the news application guardian is a terrorist tool.
Ulrich@feddit.org 12 hours ago
I read the entire thing. I don’t need it explained to me. It’s clear just by looking at it that they’re targeting all encrypted communications.
I think it’s pretty obvious that they could.