Comment

Comment on Judge Rules Training AI on Authors' Books Is Legal But Pirating Them Is Not

If what you are saying is true, why were these ‘AI’s” incapable of rendering a full wine glass? It “knows the concept of a full glass of water, but because of humanities social pressures, a full wine glass is the epitome of gluttony, art work did not depict a full wine glass, no matter how ai prompters demanded, it was unable to link the concepts until it was literally created for it to regurgitate it out. Its seems it doesn’t really learn, but regurgitates art out in collages of taken assets, smoothed over at the seems.

source

Sort:hotnew top

alsimoneau@lemmy.ca ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago
Copilot did it just fine

Image

source
- WraithGear@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago
  1 it’s not full, but closer then it was.
  
  I specifically said that the AI was unable to do it until someone specifically made a reference so that it could start passing the test so it’s a little bit late to prove much.
  
  source
  - alsimoneau@lemmy.ca ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago
    The concept of a glass being full and of a liquid being wine can probably be separated fairly well. I assume that as models got more complex they started being able to do this more.
    
    source
    WraithGear@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago
    You mean when the training data becomes more complete. But that’s the thing, when this issue was being tested, the’AI’ would swear up and down that the normally filled wine glasses were full, when it was pointed out that it was not indeed full, the ‘AI’ would agree, and change some other aspect of the picture it didn’t fully understand. You got wine glasses where the wine would half phase out of the bounds of the cup. And yet still be just as empty. No amount of additional checks will help without an appropriate reference
    
    I use ‘AI’ extensively, i have one running locally on my computer, i swap out from time to time. I don’t have anything against its use with certain exceptions. But i can not stand people personifying it beyond its scope
    
    Here is a good example. I am working on an APP so every once in a wile i will send it code to check. But i have to be very careful. The code it spits out will be unoptimized like: =IF (variable IS true, true, false) .
    
    Some have issues with object permanence, or the consideration of time outside its training data. Its like saying a computer can generate a true random number, by making the function to calculate a number more convoluted.
    
    source
- antonim@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago
  Bro are you a robot yourself? Does that look like a glass full of wine?
  
  source
  - alsimoneau@lemmy.ca ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago
    If someone ask for a glass of water you don’t fill it all the way to the edge. This is way overfull compared to what you’re supposed to serve.
    
    source
    antonim@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago
    Oh man…
    
    That is the point, to show how AI image generators easily fail to produce something that rarely occurs out there in reality (i.e. is absent from training data), even though intuitively (from the viewpoint of human intelligence) it seems like it should be trivial to portray.
    
    source
    wpb@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago
    Omg are you an llm?
    
    source