Comment on Bluesky is more open than you think.
poVoq@slrpnk.net 18 hours agoWell, if you have read it then your cherry picking of minor ways Bluesky is slighly less closed comes accross as pretty bad faith 🤷
Comment on Bluesky is more open than you think.
poVoq@slrpnk.net 18 hours agoWell, if you have read it then your cherry picking of minor ways Bluesky is slighly less closed comes accross as pretty bad faith 🤷
irelephant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 hours ago
I have read it, and a lot of the problems have been addressed.
Bluesky is still very early. There was an awkward period where lemmy was mostly lemmy.ml.
I’m not trying to cherry pick anything, I’m just addressing arguments against it I have seen.
Blaze@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 hours ago
Lemmy.ml, lemmy.world, lemmy.zip and any other instance run on the same software
Wafrn doesn’t run the same software as Bluesky.social
irelephant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 hours ago
My point was that the network was fairly centralised in the beginning. The people behind atproto.africa are working on an alternate bluesky appview anyway.
Blaze@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 hours ago
Good to hear!
The main difference is still that every work put into Bluesky.social can not be reused by other “servers”, unlike Lemmy
fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com 3 hours ago
Still is. Always will be.