I’m sure you still think it was a great thing we got to iraq before they set off those wmd’s
Comment on Operation Narnia: Iran’s nuclear scientists reportedly killed simultaneously using special weapon
MangioneDontMiss@lemmy.ca 3 weeks agoo no! israel thwarted iran’s nuclear ambitions! the horror!!!
TheLiveFive@lemm.ee 3 weeks ago
MangioneDontMiss@lemmy.ca 3 weeks ago
i’m sure i don’t make asinine assumptions about other people.
hark@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
Iran has the right to defend themselves and israel has proven again that Iran is in need of this defense.
MangioneDontMiss@lemmy.ca 3 weeks ago
iran shouldn’t have funded hamas and terrorist activity around the world. Iran fucked around and now its finding out.
hark@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
Iran is simply countering the terrorist state known as israel.
MangioneDontMiss@lemmy.ca 3 weeks ago
the terrorist state that launched a war against real terrorists after they murdered over 1200 people and took hundreds of people including children hostage.
your REAL terrorist propaganda doesn’t work on me.
kcweller@feddit.nl 3 weeks ago
It’s civilian scientists working on nuclear energy we are talking about.
You’re part of the problem.
TheRealKuni@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
Is it though? What level of enrichment do they need for a nuclear energy program, and what level of enrichment were they at? I think it’s naive to say they weren’t working on a weapon.
I’m not saying it justifies killing civilian scientists, but we ought to be honest about the why.
kcweller@feddit.nl 3 weeks ago
Where is the evidence that they are working on a weapon? There are people getting murdered because people have become brainwashed enough to just assume Iran is working on a nukes.
I’m just saying, killing civilians on the basis of assumption is a pretty terrorist move and feels very similar to how Iraq was bombed to hell by America. But hey, that’s just my 2 cents.
TheRealKuni@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
According to the IAEA, the Natanz site was producing uranium enriched to 60% u-235.
For electricity, you need 3-5% u-235.
That’s not an energy program, that’s a weapons program.
MangioneDontMiss@lemmy.ca 3 weeks ago
o my sweet summer child…
kcweller@feddit.nl 3 weeks ago
I’m not saying they couldn’t be. I’m saying that the official body meant to oversee this has not yet put out proof that they are. So we can imagine all we want. If the professional independent watchdog that is checking for this has not officially made a statement with undeniable proof that they are, they aren’t.
Who has more insight in the matter, you or the IAEA?