Comment on Uber, Lyft oppose some bills that aim to prevent assaults during rides
thesmokingman@programming.dev 6 days ago- What about ride share companies that aren’t Uber or Lyft that don’t have safety programs?
- What requirement do Uber or Lyft have to maintain good safety after, say, they own the market?
FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 6 days ago
Laws and regulations already exist that all ride share companies have to follow around things like vetting their drivers.
thesmokingman@programming.dev 6 days ago
In the US? I’m gonna need to see some statutes there bud. Last I checked there are no federal requirements and as far as I can tell there are only insurance requirements in Colorado at the moment.
FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 6 days ago
Yeah in the US. Take California for example:
rkmlaw.net/ridesharing-regulations-in-california/
thesmokingman@programming.dev 6 days ago
California is not Colorado nor is it federal. I don’t think you understand the things you’re saying since you don’t seem to grasp, as you put it, the regulations are “often state-specific.” You linked California, not Colorado, which this article is in reference to. Even in the beginning, you didn’t seem to grasp why regulation and some level of understanding about what people should or shouldn’t do is reasonable to have defined. Good luck!