Comment on Uber, Lyft oppose some bills that aim to prevent assaults during rides
thesmokingman@programming.dev 6 days agoCalifornia is not Colorado nor is it federal. I don’t think you understand the things you’re saying since you don’t seem to grasp, as you put it, the regulations are “often state-specific.” You linked California, not Colorado, which this article is in reference to. Even in the beginning, you didn’t seem to grasp why regulation and some level of understanding about what people should or shouldn’t do is reasonable to have defined. Good luck!
FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 6 days ago
No shit, did you even read my comment?
Regulations already exist in every state that ride share companies operate in, including any state where taxis operate.
People are already not supposed to sexually assault their passengers. Will adding another regulation saying they shouldn’t do that, even when one already exists, suddenly stop it from happening? No.