Instead the message is "no child should ever sleep on the streets. We made it impossible to sleep on this bench because it’s for people we want here.
Comment on I'm gonna mute this one
Tja@programming.dev 11 hours agoIt’s more like “no kid should ever sleep on the streets so we provide them with shelter and support”, but that doesn’t make a good internet rant m
Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 10 hours ago
Tja@programming.dev 9 hours ago
So you would prefer that there is no shelter and more benches for homeless children?
I think the message is perfectly clear, and people online are just looking for reasons to be upset (not that they would do something about it, just posting angrily).
Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 9 hours ago
I would prefer shelter and no anti-homeless architecture. But I get that you prefer anti-homeless architecture and no shelter, since we’re being uncharitable.
Tja@programming.dev 7 hours ago
I live in a country where if you don’t have a job the government will pay for your rent and utilities, indefinitely.
Additionally, I have a deal with them as well: If they don’t sleep on the benches I will not sit in their beds. Works wonders.
My_IFAKs___gone@lemmy.world 10 hours ago
It would be nice to see shelter and support being provided, rather than a bisected bench designed to discourage the ability to comfortably lie down for a night’s rest.
Tja@programming.dev 9 hours ago
As far as a quick Google search goes, support seems to be provided, they offer 2000 shelter spots across north America.
grue@lemmy.world 10 hours ago
Except for the part where, in reality, they didn’t actually do that.
Tja@programming.dev 9 hours ago
My knowledge is limited to a short wikipedia scan, but I didn’t see any reason to doubt they do it. Feel free to link some info if you know better.
grue@lemmy.world 8 hours ago
duckduckgo.com/?t=ffab&q=not+enough+homeless+shel…
Tja@programming.dev 7 hours ago
Do you think there’s only 1 charity in north America? What a weird argument to make.