Okay, yes, it might violate consent, but it’s also funny.
And it would be weird fir me to say there are times when i wont hold someone accountable for murder for a sufficiently good bit, but not this.
Comment on Oink
funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works 2 days ago
including others in your kink without permission is a violation of consent, easy break up - this man does not respect boundaries, and does not practice SSC/RACK
Okay, yes, it might violate consent, but it’s also funny.
And it would be weird fir me to say there are times when i wont hold someone accountable for murder for a sufficiently good bit, but not this.
daggermoon@lemmy.world 2 days ago
How do you know it’s a kink?
RainDog@piefed.social 2 days ago
Because kink is only 3 letters away from oink.
Grostleton@lemm.ee 2 days ago
One letter away? Unless I’m missing a joke in which case feel free to “wooooosh” me.
Lauchmelder@feddit.org 2 days ago
SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 days ago
Oink
O->K
Kink.
Oink->Kink
Don’t worry, It took me a second, too. Perspective is everything.
remotedev@lemmy.ca 2 days ago
LMN I’m guessing
Lumisal@lemmy.world 1 day ago
Exactly, he could just be a cop.
So still a reason to break up with him, but a different one
outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 day ago
*iy; he suggests personhood.
idiomaddict@lemmy.world 1 day ago
More importantly, how do we know that he knows it’s a kink?