Maybe we should have a !cancel_cancel_lemmy community x)
Comment on Cancel Lemmy - A piefed community to discuss Alternatives to and moving away from Lemmy
Bags@piefed.social 9 months agoI'll also comment to say that the "cancel" part of this is stupid and should be reconsidered. (There seems to be a pretty thorough consensus on that). Isn't the whole point of this to have options, to spread the resources out to as many points as possible to prevent a single point of failure, corruption, or censorship?
I ended up at Piefed, because I'm interested in self-hosting, and I understand Python more than any of the other languages represented. That's really the full depth of my choice, and I'm not sure there should be much more thought behind it other than "How does this particular software package perform and meet my needs?"
Blaze@piefed.social 9 months ago
CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 9 months ago
I think I’d distinguish between a voluntary boycott and a top-down choice by some media monopoly. The latter is what the fediverse is designed to avoid.
How close are you to self-hosting? I’m pretty curious what the overhead is like, since Python is intrinsically going to need more.
Bags@piefed.social 9 months ago
Not very. Still working on getting a VPN set up and learning the ropes of self-hosting in general. Most of the research I've been doing has mentioned that Piefed seems to take less resources than Lemmy for some reason. We'll see how it goes once I actually figure all this out. I just learned that my choice of home internet might make it difficult since I apparently can't get a static IP. (T mobile 5G)
CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 9 months ago
Interesting! Having looked at the Lemmy code, I do have my suspicions about the way it (currently) manages database access.
Yeah, getting a static IP has been a pain for decades. Best of luck!