Electricblush@lemmy.world 6 days ago
This is so stupid and pointless…
“Thing not made to solve spesific task fails against thing made for it…”
This is like saying that a really old hand pushed lawn mower is better then a SUV at cutting grass…
Electricblush@lemmy.world 6 days ago
This is so stupid and pointless…
“Thing not made to solve spesific task fails against thing made for it…”
This is like saying that a really old hand pushed lawn mower is better then a SUV at cutting grass…
SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 6 days ago
SUVs aren’t marketed as grass mowers. LLMs are marketed as AI with all the answers.
otp@sh.itjust.works 6 days ago
I’d be interested in seeing marketing of ChatGPT as a competitive boardgame player. Is there any?
pinball_wizard@lemmy.zip 4 days ago
These tools are marketed as replacing lots of jobs that are a hell of a lot more complex than a simple board game.
otp@sh.itjust.works 4 days ago
There isn’t really a single sliding scale of “complexity” when it comes to certain tasks.
Given the appropriate input, a calculator can divide two numbers. But it can’t count the number of R’s in the word “strawberry”.
Meanwhile, a script that could count the number of instances of a letter in a word could count those R’s, but it couldn’t divide any two numbers.
Similarly, we didn’t complain that a typewriter couldn’t put pepperoni slices onto a pizza.
arararagi@ani.social 4 days ago
Hear hear.
SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world 6 days ago
Source?