You think the state of NASA isn’t caused by privately funded politicians?
Comment on We Should Immediately Nationalize SpaceX and Starlink
FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 2 months agoThose are different to taking over private companies. The government should, imo, compete against private enterprise in those areas, in turn bringing prices down and making it better for the taxpayers.
NASA is government owned. Look at the state of it. Do you think the government taking over SpaceX would really be a good thing?
Kickforce@lemmy.wtf 2 months ago
FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 2 months ago
So you think those privately funded politicians should be in charge of the state of SpaceX?
Kickforce@lemmy.wtf 2 months ago
No, the private funding of politicians, which nowhere in the world happens as thoroughly or blatantly as in the US, is another issue to solve. It’s companies pushing for privatization of services that they sabotage first to show that the government doesn’t do well with them. It’s like the postal service headed by that Trump appointee that was a big cheese in a transport firma. I forgot his name.
FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 2 months ago
So they were sabotaging nasa for all those years before SpaceX was a thing for what reason?
TronBronson@lemmy.world 2 months ago
Nice 30-year-old Fox News talking points you got there. Time to go to bed, grandpa.
FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 2 months ago
What points are you talking about exactly?