Comment on Microsoft’s Recall feature is still threat to privacy despite recent tweaks
NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 3 weeks ago
Um, the core feature is privacy invasion. It does what it says on the tin.
It’s fine if some people want that functionality, as long as it’s not enabled by default.
Zagorath@aussie.zone 3 weeks ago
One could argue that it’s a feature that could be done on-client without sending to a server. Or with its server component doing nothing more than syncing with E2E encryption.
russjr08@bitforged.space 3 weeks ago
I have zero interest in Recall, but I thought it was already done on-device? IIRC it always was that way, which is why it’s only available on new computers containing dedicated “neural coprocessors” I believe was the term.
Now given that it’s closed source, you have to trust that they aren’t silently sending data back to themselves - which is where my problem lies, I don’t trust them in the slightest.
sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 3 weeks ago
You can verify that nothing is being sent back by watching network traffic. I guess they could hide it in update packets, but thats pretty unlikely.
Zagorath@aussie.zone 3 weeks ago
I’ll admit I’ve not looked into it. My computer won’t even upgrade to Windows 11 if I wanted it to, thanks to MS’s artificial restriction on compatibility. Maybe it is all on-device. But if so, whence all the privacy complaints? And does it not allow syncing between devices?
FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 2 weeks ago
So you don’t even know and didn’t bother to check if it is on-device before attacking it for not being on-device?
FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 2 weeks ago
Recall is done on-client.