no worries. as I said, i understand your chosen confusion.
I have removed the word “radiological” for you.
you made zero progress on disproving chemtrails the biological weapon’s experiments and yhe 1976 Senate hearing, but that is all objective historical fact verified by the US government.
you never had a chance.
Carrolade@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
Hey now, I wasn’t trying to disprove chemtrails, or anything else you listed, that’s not how proof works. Nothing can be proven to be impossible or not exist, that’s illogical. I was pointing out you mixing together facts with lies to manipulate.
Now you say you removed radiological, but it’s too late. I had to call you out, first, and the timestamps show it. Because you tried being sneaky first. Just like a sneaky liar. I would far rather be honestly confused than a dishonest manipulator.
Varyk@sh.itjust.works 3 weeks ago
“wasn’t trying to disprove chemtrail”
you tried, you failed, it was fun.
keep making things up, I said the same at the top as I am saying now.
chemtrails are real, the US government admitted it at the 1976 Church committee hearing
the facts are facts despite your bitter imagination.
Carrolade@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
If you were consistent in what you said, there wouldn’t be edit markers.
Varyk@sh.itjust.works 3 weeks ago
you can check my post history, I constantly edit things to make sure people understand as clearly as possible what I’m saying, specifically for cases like yours. I’ll edit them days after the post if I think there’s a more concise and clear way that a future reader or you couldn’t possibly misinterpret, no matter how little you read and how much you’re making up.
you’re welcome.