No, I’m referring to when you said
harmful chemical, biological and radiological agents and weapons
in the original main body of your post. By the way, we can all see the edit marker from you editing it 22 minutes ago. My first reply to you remains unedited, though, it’s exactly how I originally wrote it, where I directly quoted you three times.
Trying to pull a ghost edit on us betrays you as malicious, though. You’re not just wrong, you’re actively trying to do harm. Otherwise you could just admit you made a mistake like a normal person can.
Regardless, now that your credibility is shattered by your own actions, my work here is done. Toodles~! It’s been fun, I do miss rhetorically fencing with trolls sometimes.
Varyk@sh.itjust.works 3 weeks ago
no worries. as I said, i understand your chosen confusion.
I have removed the word “radiological” for you.
you made zero progress on disproving chemtrails the biological weapon’s experiments and yhe 1976 Senate hearing, but that is all objective historical fact verified by the US government.
you never had a chance.
Carrolade@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
Hey now, I wasn’t trying to disprove chemtrails, or anything else you listed, that’s not how proof works. Nothing can be proven to be impossible or not exist, that’s illogical. I was pointing out you mixing together facts with lies to manipulate.
Now you say you removed radiological, but it’s too late. I had to call you out, first, and the timestamps show it. Because you tried being sneaky first. Just like a sneaky liar. I would far rather be honestly confused than a dishonest manipulator.
Varyk@sh.itjust.works 3 weeks ago
“wasn’t trying to disprove chemtrail”
you tried, you failed, it was fun.
keep making things up, I said the same at the top as I am saying now.
chemtrails are real, the US government admitted it at the 1976 Church committee hearing
the facts are facts despite your bitter imagination.
Carrolade@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
If you were consistent in what you said, there wouldn’t be edit markers.