Comment

vrighter@discuss.tchncs.de ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

and again, in the definition you just pasted in there does not say anything about closed form solutions. You keep contradicting yourself in trying to die on that hill

source

Sort:hotnew top

Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago
It’s implicit in the method. There also isn’t a definition of computability in the papers or Wikipedia because it assumes you have a basic understanding.

Chaotic functions require that you iteratively step through them because they aren’t closed form.

“For chaotic systems the evolution equations always include nonlinear terms,5 which makes “closed-form” solutions of these equations impossible—roughly, a closed-form solution is a single formula that allows one to simply plug in the time of the desired prediction into the equation and determine the state of the system at that time.”

www.sciencedirect.com/topics/…/chaos-theory#%3A~%…

I last wrote a paper on chaos in a mechanical system 35 years but I haven’t forgotten the basics.

source
- vrighter@discuss.tchncs.de ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago
  but you’re still wrong
  
  source
  - Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago
    You still don’t understand the links you are providing. Fuck, just read the English words even if you don’t understand the math.
    
    “We aim to present reversible systems which lie on the border of solvability/integrability and chaos.”
    
    The intro says it’s not chaotic but a function that borders on chaotic.
    
    “We adjusted the precision in such a way that the true initial data and the result of this round trip did not differ by more than 10−3.”
    
    Their function isn’t even reversible but only allows for an approximation of reversibility.
    
    Conclusion:
    
    “We have shown that there exist infinite families of rational maps which, at the same time, have positive algebraic entropy, present features of chaos, and are solvable.”
    
    FEATURES OF CHAOS ISN’T CHAOS.
    
    source