If a woman has sex with me (hypothetically) because she saw me wearing expensive clothes, but later it turns out they were cheap imitations, that would be misleading, but not rape.
Comment on How I discovered my partner was an undercover police officer sent to spy on me
Genius@lemmy.zip 6 days agoIt’s fucking rape.
owl@infosec.pub 5 days ago
Scary_le_Poo@beehaw.org 4 days ago
No it isn’t.
Valmond@lemmy.world 6 days ago
As horrible this is (as owl said) how do you figure out it is rape?
Genius@lemmy.zip 6 days ago
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rape_by_deception
False name, false life story, false reason for having sex with her. He had sex with her in order to spy on her.
Valmond@lemmy.world 5 days ago
Soon: it was rape because I thought he was nice.
If everything is rape, then nothing is.
Taleya@aussie.zone 5 days ago
It’s sex under false pretences and deception. That’s a legally defined rape.
owl@infosec.pub 5 days ago
I agree with you. If being misleading is equal to rape, then this rule can easily be abused.