Comment on U.S. inks bill to force geo-tracking tech for high-end gaming and AI GPUs
pupbiru@aussie.zone 2 weeks agoright and this is a public message board in which multiple people can carry on a conversation
Comment on U.S. inks bill to force geo-tracking tech for high-end gaming and AI GPUs
pupbiru@aussie.zone 2 weeks agoright and this is a public message board in which multiple people can carry on a conversation
FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 2 weeks ago
Sure, but when you jump in the middle of another 2 people’s conversation to say you disagree, it’s not up to the other people to automatically know that you’re actually disagreeing with something different to what they’re discussing lol
pupbiru@aussie.zone 2 weeks ago
that is literally what you’re discussing… they never said anything about gaming: they just said GPUs… just admit you misunderstood mate
FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 2 weeks ago
Nvidia AI gpu’s don’t have <16GB of RAM. They have 48+. Some have over 180GB. They were talking about desktop GPUs, the RTX series.
pupbiru@aussie.zone 2 weeks ago
there was no mention of desktop, OR RTX
and VRAM limitations almost certainly don’t apply to chinese GPUs: the process node is the only limitation in chinas manufacturing capability
i would absolutely not be surprised if they have a 256GB+ card that is equal to an 8yo nvidia/amd card at 1/5th the price and just dump more in… for the same reason that GPUs are better than CPUs for models, many GPUs is better than a single fast GPU
and that’s still only barely relevant because as i said previously, workstation GPUs etc don’t need that - there are plenty of workloads that fit the bill for a card from 8 years ago, and they never mentioned anything about large cards or ML workloads or gaming