Comment on An EXTREMELY Simple Guide to Mastodon
Eyekaytee@aussie.zone 19 hours agothen you need to decide your instance
Just use mastodon.social
If you feel like you want to join a more specific community then you can
Comment on An EXTREMELY Simple Guide to Mastodon
Eyekaytee@aussie.zone 19 hours agothen you need to decide your instance
Just use mastodon.social
If you feel like you want to join a more specific community then you can
LandedGentry@lemmy.zip 19 hours ago
We both know that is not how this should work. If everybody joins the same instance, we’re basically right back where we started. We want people to be distributed among other instances.
If one instance has 97% of the userbase then they basically get to dictate the whole thing. What if mastodon.social ended up being hexbear or lemmygrad? Or some MAGA right wing instance?
lgsp@feddit.it 18 hours ago
But this doesn’t happen. Mastodon.social is far from 90%, and the former CEO made the choice of letting control go to an entity that is no-profit, I think it’s the right choice.
manxu@piefed.social 18 hours ago
I think it's the "basically" part in basically right back where we started that makes the difference. Even if 100% of Fediverse users were on a single instance, once that instance starts pulling Musk moves, the users can move somewhere else.
Only if that instance defederates from everyone else do we get the Twitter situation again. Or, since that's actually what happened, Truth Social, which I think is just a slightly modified Mastodon instance with federation disabled/deactivated.