I don’t read it that way as it doesn’t specify at all. That’s the article’s headline. It’s just shared as it is
Comment on China's Green Energy Surge Has Caused CO2 Emissions to Fall for the First Time
floofloof@lemmy.ca 1 month ago
As far as I can see, it caused China’s CO2 emissions to fall. The headline reads misleadingly as if global emissions fell. Global emissions continue to rise.
SteveKLord@slrpnk.net 1 month ago
floofloof@lemmy.ca 1 month ago
I didn’t mean to criticize you. I recognize that it’s the original wording.
SteveKLord@slrpnk.net 1 month ago
No worries, friend. It’s a valid point. Publications do try to pull readers in with vague wording sometimes. If the rest of the world follows China’s model maybe things will improve on a more global scale.
NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 1 month ago
I mean sure, but I’m gonna take small victories where I can. In the constant news cycle of depressing news. This is a small bit of hope for climate action.
Manifish_Destiny@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Honestly this is the best climate related news I’ve heard in like, 5 years.
NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Exactly, I don’t know why people have to always turn stuff into a negative.