Comment on Avoiding AI is hard – but our freedom to opt out must be protected
CrayonDevourer@lemmy.world 3 days ago
Oh no, people are assaulting me with their different opinions!
No - you can’t say no. People have a right to use AI in their productions, and your opinion cannot force them to do otherwise.
As with anything - the moment your opinion starts to dictate other people’s lives, it becomes invalid.
So what counts as dictating my life?
The government prohibiting me from firing my gun in the air, or my neighbor’s falling bullets prohibiting me from leaving my porch?
I’m always suspect of those who assume there is only “freedom to do” and not also “freedom from being done-to”.
They tend to think they will never be on the receiving end of someone else’s “freedom”.
Re-read your post and try to pinpoint where you contradict yourself. If you are unable to do so, you could ask chat gpt for help.
Is that because you can’t pinpoint it yourself? There’s a reason that you can’t.
Oh no, people are assaulting me with their different opinions!
No - you can’t say no. People have a right to use AI in their productions, and your opinion cannot force them to do otherwise.
They have no right to force me to endure said “productions” garbage.
Nobody is forcing you to do anything by their use of AI.
They are, tho.
My insurance companies push me to speak to Ai before real people. Ai is used to sort and database medical records, in use in many careers to spy on employees, and lie to and manipulate younger generations into militant dumbasses. I didn’t opt-in, and I can’t opt-out unless I use a bullet or this cancer is abolished from the earth.
You have the ability to choose an insurance company that doesn’t use those things.
Libertarians can fuck right off.
What we need is the possibility to protect the content we did created.
zeca@lemmy.eco.br 3 days ago
What if their use of AI affects me? Is my opinion invalid when my opinion is that you shouldnt be allowed to pollute a river that I depend on for accessing water? Have you thought about this for more than 2 seconds?
CrayonDevourer@lemmy.world 3 days ago
Have YOU? - Your example is clearly them violating the rights of others.
zeca@lemmy.eco.br 3 days ago
CrayonDevourer@lemmy.world 3 days ago
No, because you use the uppermost-bound of the statement. Your opinion doesn’t take precident as the opinion above it already violates the rights of others.