50% of the post here are. Echo chambers rely on most users never reading the article.
frostysauce@lemmy.world 1 day ago
The title of this post is sensationalized, click-baitey, and factually incorrect according to the posted text. It’s as if OP either didn’t read the text they copy/pasted or they are trying to intentionally stir up shit…
saltesc@lemmy.world 1 day ago
lambalicious@lemmy.sdf.org 1 day ago
Two out of three. I read the post and that’s exactly what the admins of F.O say will do. It’s them who are stirring up shit.
IndustryStandard@lemmy.world 1 day ago
Nothing in the post is incorrect or sensationalized. You did not read it.
Takapapatapaka@lemmy.world 1 day ago
“they will ban criticism of Israel” : they will only ban calls for end of Israel and equating Nazis and Israel. You can still criticize Israel. Its like saying “They ban fruits” when they only ban oranges. It’s still a problem, but you’re making it larger than it seems, that’s on the path of clickbait/sensationalism (i do not think that this was intended of you though, it’s just what comes out of the way you wrote it).
IndustryStandard@lemmy.world 21 hours ago
Apartheid South Africa needs to be dissolved.
Israel needs to be dissolved.
What is the difference between these two sentences and why is one of them banned on feddit.org?
Takapapatapaka@lemmy.world 21 hours ago
As you explained in your post, because of some bullshit german law and admin decision. It’s bad. We agree on this.
Your title should still be ‘bans calls for end of Israel and calling Israel nazis’ or at the very least ‘bans some criticism of Israel’.
rammer@sopuli.xyz 23 hours ago
Equating Nazis and Zionists, if the shoe fits. You should be allowed to say it.
Takapapatapaka@lemmy.world 22 hours ago
Overall agreeing with you, you should at least be able to defend this pov.
But that should be the title instead of ‘bans all criticism of Israel’.