Comment

Comment on Can you read and understand this passage?

Kind of, “It was very muddy in London” but nobody talks like this today, so it sounds very strange. I’m personally not a fan. I don’t think there’s a complete sentence anywhere in that passage.

Sentence fragments, capitalized and punctuated like fresh immigrants assimilating to their new mother.

source

Sort:hotnew top

andros_rex@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago
Nabokov seemed to think that the fog was important. I guess it’s a novel about a legal case, and maybe the metaphor is the “fog” of legal confusion.

Image

Image

source
- Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world ⁨22⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago
  Nabokov? You mean that guy from The Police song?
  
  source
  - andros_rex@lemmy.world ⁨22⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago
    Hey - don’t stand so close to me.
    
    Nabokov is fun, because he had an opinion on basically every author ever. If you feel frustrated about something you read in an English class, you can probably find an essay by Nabokov reading that author as filth.
    
    “Dostoyevsky’s lack of taste, his monotonous dealings with persons suffering with pre- Freudian complexes, the way he has of wallowing in the tragic misadventures of human English words expressing several, although by no means all, aspects of poshlost are, for instance,” cheap," “sham,” “smutty,” “highfalutin,”“in bad taste.” dignity - all this is difficult to admire. I do not like this trick his characters have of “sinning their way to Jesus" or, as a Russian author, Ivan Bunin, put it more bluntly, "spilling Jesus all over the place.”
    
    Like c’mon man - if you don’t feel something reading the Grand Inquisitor in Karamazov - are you human?
    
    source