Y’all are being way too harsh. I’m sure he has a really good reason for why he enabled and protected Harvey Weinstein’s rapery. Something so convincing that we’d all say, “you were absolutely right to help blow up the lives of fellow artists. You’re really not a piece of shit!”
I really thought that my sarcasm was obvious, especially with that last sentence… Apparently there are people out there who are more openly shitty than I realized.
There’s never a good reason to enable and protect rape.
Any standard set lower than this should be grounds to get throat-punched.
thefartographer@lemm.ee 12 hours ago
Y’all are being way too harsh. I’m sure he has a really good reason for why he enabled and protected Harvey Weinstein’s rapery. Something so convincing that we’d all say, “you were absolutely right to help blow up the lives of fellow artists. You’re really not a piece of shit!”
entwine413@lemm.ee 11 hours ago
There’s never a good reason to enable and protect rape.
thefartographer@lemm.ee 10 hours ago
I really thought that my sarcasm was obvious, especially with that last sentence… Apparently there are people out there who are more openly shitty than I realized.
Any standard set lower than this should be grounds to get throat-punched.
entwine413@lemm.ee 10 hours ago
Yeah, there are absolutely people who honestly believe that exposing Weinstein was a bad thing. Humans suck.
neatobuilds@lemmy.today 10 hours ago
Its just the internet and text, sarcasm doesnt translate; Poe’s law