Analogies are fallacies. All they do is reveal that you can’t argue the merits of the topic at hand, so you need to derail and distract by pivoting to something else.
Now we need to debate the accuracy of your analogy, which is never 1:1, instead of talking about what we were talking about previously.
You’re also arguing with the wrong person. You should be talking to the person who argued “AI is a negative because pretty much nobody likes it” instead of the person who says it’s not true that “nobody likes it.”
AI discussion at this point are litmus tests for who is an average layman that lets other laymen do their thinking for them. It really puts into perspective how much popular opinion should be scrutinized.
jsomae@lemmy.ml 1 day ago
You do realize the root of this thread was this question, right?