I dunno, that’s a lot of reading. I’d rather share what I think than learn what someone else thinks. Can’t I just react to the first impression?
Comment on AI will replace routine — freeing people for creativity.
sommerset@thelemmy.club 3 days ago
let’s see how many people actually read the post and not just a title. 👌
stolen from here: colonelcassad.livejournal.com/9823609.html#cutid1
who stole from here: t.me/Taynaya_kantselyariya/12400
themeatbridge@lemmy.world 3 days ago
StupidBrotherInLaw@lemmy.world 2 days ago
You need a /s, I’ve actually seen people honestly make arguments like this.
sommerset@thelemmy.club 3 days ago
Knock yourself out
themeatbridge@lemmy.world 2 days ago
That you. I don’t feel strongly one way or the other.
sentient_loom@sh.itjust.works 3 days ago
I read the post, but with this kind of title people actually should just skip the article and ridicule the clickbait title. Because it’s intentionally selling the opposite message of the actual post. And that opposite message is not worth reading in detail.
echodot@feddit.uk 2 days ago
Anyone who’s used AI for more than about 10 minutes knows that it isn’t ready to replace human workers yet. Knows that it isn’t ready to replace human workers yet
It’s always funny when tech companies decide to fire all of their programmers so that they can replace them with AI only to have to rehire them again all of about 2 months later
sentient_loom@sh.itjust.works 2 days ago
It’s not necessarily a 1:1 person-replacer. Instead you can squeeze a smaller number of employees to do more work. I suspect artists and animators are losing a lot of work. And we’re still in early days. Even if LLMs don’t improve much, our implementation will.
sommerset@thelemmy.club 2 days ago
It literally replaced bunch of jobs at my friend company wlready
echodot@feddit.uk 2 days ago
Such as what?