It’s more about the less people have to lose the more they are willing to risk
I like how people think destroying everything will somehow result in a future where people are empathetic.
Kroxx@lemm.ee 1 day ago
IrateAnteater@sh.itjust.works 1 day ago
When the people end up with nothing left to lose, things tend to get exceptionally shitty for a few generations. Then it’s a die toss to figure out if what comes after that is any better or not.
Zorque@lemmy.world 1 day ago
It’s not really a die toss because the people with power maintain that power and have the most influence in what comes out of that shit-pool. It needs a functional shakeup at the deepest level, and not superficial changes at the surface level to make an effective difference. Otherwise things will just continue to repeat until we destroy ourselves. The problem is that kind of shakeup requires that people remain vigilant and involved for their entire lives, which isn’t going to happen if their only concern is that their own lives are getting disrupted and they want it to go back to par, which is our current standoff.
SendMePhotos@lemmy.world 1 day ago
Phoenix?
GuyFawkes@midwest.social 1 day ago
Agreed; that jackass has pushed me firmly into the “let leopards eat all their faces” camp as opposed to giving a shit WHY they’re so fuckin stupid anymore.