or, hear me out, if we had more reasonable copyright and IP laws the permission wouldn’t be necessary for a completely dead 28 year old game that fans spent a great deal of effort reviving with no help or financing from the original rights owner
If the person who holds the code refuses to give it out because they are a jerk then so be it I guess but the law should not stop them from doing so in this scenario. It is absurd
baltakatei@sopuli.xyz 4 days ago
If it were up to me, copyright would only last 20 years after publication for non-commercial use and author’s life + 4 years for commercial use.
ragebutt@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 days ago
If it were up to me copyright would be nonexistent for non commercial use. Who gives a shit if someone makes a fan project of your precious idea
Commercial use I don’t know but far less than lifetime. Disney has fucked our brains with propaganda here. Creative processes flourish by remixing and making derivative works. That’s literally how Disney got to where they are. Realistically if you can’t make money in the first 10-20 years of release how likely is it that you will ever make money? Should we really stifle artistic freedom for the 0.0001% of creators that make something and take 30 years for it to catch on?
Not to mention that this doesn’t mean your gravy train is cut off. If people buy your book or cd or whatever after 21 years you still make money. We could even make a compromised law that derivative works are okay but as long as you’re alive commercial use of the original work is protected, eg if someone wants to just sell a copy of your book or use your song in an ad you can demand payment or stop them? Although this is stupid because then you get into the pissing match of what defines the boundary of a derivative work
And eternal life of copyright is what has led to us having our current culture in decline media landscape of endless sequels, remakes, milking licenses, and reboots. Why risk a new IP when you own 3000000 “safe bets” you can endlessly recycle bullshit
Like what’s at my local theater right now:
Thunderbolts: milking the marvel IP still
The accountant 2: never heard of the first one but it deserved a sequel, apparently
Minecraft: not a sequel or remake, at least, but cash in license nonsense to print money from kids and nostalgia bait the older zoomers that grew up attached to ipads
Final destination: bloodlines: good thing there’s not already like 8 final destination movies that are progressively shittier
Lilo and stitch: not the original, a live action remake. Fun fact: the writers guild doesn’t cover animated films so when Disney remakes these classic animated movies as live action they can reuse the same story and screw the original writers
Mission impossible: the final reckoning: I bet this isn’t the final reckoning
How to train your dragon: live action remake, probably using the same Disney loophole to fuck over writers
Interestingly they’re also showing a mystery horror movie Plus some others that to be fair seem like original IP: sinners, shadow force, the last rodeo, ballerina
Then a bunch of classics like one flew over the cuckoos nest and raiders of the lost ark
7:4 garbage to original. 64% “we’re out of ideas”.
moakley@lemmy.world 3 days ago
That doesn’t really track. You think that allowing everyone to use existing characters would incentivize them to create new characters?
A lot of the original works we do get are because not everyone has access to the “safe bets”.
gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 days ago
Fun fact: the vast majority (like 95+%) of creative works, be they made by individuals or corporations, earn the majority of what they will earn cross their existence in the first 5 years