Comment on Shocked to hear ‘prompt engineer’ is not a real job

Interstellar_1@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨3⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

• A_norny_mousse@feddit.org ⁨3⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

  How do you prove a negative?

  source

  • LumpyPancakes@lemm.ee ⁨3⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

    A multimeter on DC.

    source
  • _cryptagion@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨3⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

    I mean, a few months back somebody posted a linkedin, mad because they were looking for a prompt engineer, so apparently it is a real job.

    source

    • towerful@programming.dev ⁨3⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

      Sounds like a project manager that can talk to engineers…

      source

      • _cryptagion@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨3⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

        Well, it IS linkedin, so it’s mostly just corpos bullshitting each other anyway.

        source
      • _druid@sh.itjust.works ⁨3⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

        I have people skills!

        source
  • tdawg@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

    In this case? Pretty easily with the right data. Though I think an opinion poll would be more interesting

    source
  • RandomVideos@programming.dev ⁨3⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

    By using the definition of the word or asking people for their opinion

    source
• AdamEatsAss@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

  It is a real job. You don’t make 6 figures doing it. There are multiple websites: outlier.ai, dataannotation.tech, stellar.ai that pay people to train LLMs. Usually for $20-$40 /hour.

  source

  • 4am@lemm.ee ⁨3⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

    Training is not prompting

    source