Comment on X.com blocks access to Ekrem Imamoglu, leader of Turkish opposition
Ulrich@feddit.org 1 day ago- How is censoring a politician “standing up for free speech”?
- “full oh shit” = not a “free speech absolutist”. “free speech absolutist” implies that you will not censor any speech no matter what.
FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 21 hours ago
You don’t seem to understand how the legal system and governments work.
They issued a legal request to censor his account in Turkey. Failure to do so would result in severe consequences for X, such as having to take X offline for all of Turkey.
X complied with the law and are challenging the censorship request in court, the only place that has the power to overrule the government.
Ulrich@feddit.org 21 hours ago
I am not a lawyer but I do understand how jurisdictions work. Elon is not in theirs.
If he were a “free speech absolutist” as he claims, he would let them.
FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 21 hours ago
Elon isn’t. X is.
Ulrich@feddit.org 21 hours ago
No it is not. Twitter is a US company with US servers. If you want to argue that the US is now a territory of Turkey, please cite a source.
No you didn’t.