Who exactly is being harmed by this?
The person being sentenced.
Comment on A Judge Accepted AI Video Testimony From a Dead Man
echodot@feddit.uk 4 weeks agoFuck everything about this, this should be prohibited
Why? Who exactly is being harmed by this? The dead guy, certainly isn’t. It’s no different than a statement from a family member. The method of delivery does not make a difference to the material content. You’re acting as if it’s putting words in the mouth of someone who’s died but everyone intellectually knows that the AI isn’t contacting the dead.
You would have a hard time arguing that someone could be confused into believing that this was actually the opinion of the deceased.
futatorius@lemm.ee 2 weeks ago
echodot@feddit.uk 2 weeks ago
The sentencing has already happened at that point so no harm is happening to anyone.
Everyone is acting as if this is going to affect decisions but it isn’t because this is a statement from the abreathed, which is something they are allowed to do in whatever format they wish. I agree it’s kind of weird but it’s definitely not against any rule no matter what the down voters think
kiagam@lemmy.world 4 weeks ago
You have a lot of faith in people’s logic level. Most people read at 6th grade level. There is a person saying “I think this”, do you really think everyone in there thought “I’m completely unaware of what the deceased thought”