Comment on Urgent ‘do not eat’ warning issued for popular meal sold in Tesco and Morrisons

blimthepixie@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨10⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

• HumanPenguin@feddit.uk ⁨10⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  Can only guess.

  But it seems logical that the rules would define contamination, as including any ingredients not listed on the packaging.

  That said. Issuing an "Urgent ‘do not eat’ warning ". Seems like an over reaction. Rather than warning folks of the error. Returns will be refunded and listing the real ingredients.

  source

  • tal@lemmy.today ⁨10⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    Issuing an "Urgent ‘do not eat’ warning ". Seems like an over reaction. Rather than warning folks of the error.

    There are some people who have serious food allergies, though I agree that for the great majority of people, eating one fish rather than the other is probably not a big deal.

    source

    • HumanPenguin@feddit.uk ⁨10⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      Hence why I said. Warn folks about the error…

      If someone sees a don’t eat warning. They will also see a potential allergy warning or contains fish warning. In. The same place.

      So informing people of the error and refunding any returns. Is no more risk then the initial sale was. And also produces a little less food and packaging waste then this.

      So save n humans. Or save the same number if humans plus kill the earth less.

      source
• essell@lemmy.world ⁨10⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  Yes, beef in a seafood lasagna (is that a thing) would be a contamination

  source

  • blimthepixie@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨10⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    Did you read the article?

    I read it as the seafood lasagna was put into a beef lasagna box, rather than the beef lasagna having prawns in it.

    source