Comment on Tesla bait-and-switch: Cybertruck owners won't get Autosteer feature they paid for
FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 1 day agoIt’s called what it is because of the laws that demand any self driving/automated driving be “supervised” and require regular checks that the driver is paying attention.
You’re essentially saying that Tesla should be made to do something that they’re already doing.
JohnEdwa@sopuli.xyz 1 day ago
Supervised self driving would be fine. “Full self driving” means SAE level 4 or 5, which the Tesla autopilot isn’t, and they don’t need “supervised” in the name as they are specifically for a situations where there simply is no driver - like a robotaxi - so there can be no supervision.
FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 1 day ago
Autopilot and FSD are completely different things.
FSD (Supervised) is not for situations where there is no driver - it’s for situations where the driver wants to just supervise while the car drives itself.
Where is this confusion around FSD and autopilot coming from all of a sudden?
JohnEdwa@sopuli.xyz 1 day ago
The “(Supervised) Full Self Driving” isn’t for situations where the car is Full Self Driving, yes, because Tesla has no functionality that meets SAE level 3/4/5 requirements for Full Self Driving. If you must supervise the driving, then it’s not full self driving.
Image
FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 1 day ago
You’re just making your own rules up now lol. You also don’t seem to understand what “supervised” means, nor the laws around cars and drivers. Teslas FSD is in use on roads now. Fully driverless cars are not legally allowed yet - they all need to have a driver in the drivers seat supervising, even if they literally never have to do a single thing.