Comment on Tesla bait-and-switch: Cybertruck owners won't get Autosteer feature they paid for

• FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

  It’s called what it is because of the laws that demand any self driving/automated driving be “supervised” and require regular checks that the driver is paying attention.

  You’re essentially saying that Tesla should be made to do something that they’re already doing.

  source

  • JohnEdwa@sopuli.xyz ⁨16⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    Supervised self driving would be fine. “Full self driving” means SAE level 4 or 5, which the Tesla autopilot isn’t, and they don’t need “supervised” in the name as they are specifically for a situations where there simply is no driver - like a robotaxi - so there can be no supervision.

    source

    • FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au ⁨11⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      Autopilot and FSD are completely different things.

      FSD (Supervised) is not for situations where there is no driver - it’s for situations where the driver wants to just supervise while the car drives itself.

      Where is this confusion around FSD and autopilot coming from all of a sudden?

      source

      • JohnEdwa@sopuli.xyz ⁨9⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

        FSD (Supervised) is not for situations where there is no driver - it’s for situations where the driver wants to just supervise while the car drives itself.

        The “(Supervised) Full Self Driving” isn’t for situations where the car is Full Self Driving, yes, because Tesla has no functionality that meets SAE level 3/4/5 requirements for Full Self Driving. If you must supervise the driving, then it’s not full self driving.

        Image

        source

        • -> View More Comments