Comment on Tesla bait-and-switch: Cybertruck owners won't get Autosteer feature they paid for
patatahooligan@lemmy.world 2 days agoIt can’t be both. It’s not self-driving. That’s just what they call it to oversell it. I’m assuming they had to add the “Supervised” part for legal reasons.
lazynooblet@lazysoci.al 2 days ago
They should get fined for being ambiguous and be forced to call it what it is.
FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 1 day ago
It’s called what it is because of the laws that demand any self driving/automated driving be “supervised” and require regular checks that the driver is paying attention.
You’re essentially saying that Tesla should be made to do something that they’re already doing.
JohnEdwa@sopuli.xyz 22 hours ago
Supervised self driving would be fine. “Full self driving” means SAE level 4 or 5, which the Tesla autopilot isn’t, and they don’t need “supervised” in the name as they are specifically for a situations where there simply is no driver - like a robotaxi - so there can be no supervision.
FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 16 hours ago
Autopilot and FSD are completely different things.
FSD (Supervised) is not for situations where there is no driver - it’s for situations where the driver wants to just supervise while the car drives itself.
Where is this confusion around FSD and autopilot coming from all of a sudden?