no no, you see Trump is totally anti-big tech. once he bleeds them dry from all the bribes they’ll be gone! /s
throwawayacc0430@sh.itjust.works 1 month ago
[deleted]
chamgireum@lemm.ee 1 month ago
Vinstaal0@feddit.nl 1 month ago
What does politics even have to do with a ruling like this? Isn’t the law separated from the government in the US? Or is the US just a corrupt country that allow people to influence the judges ruling to impact the lawsuit in a certain outcome … O wait …
prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 month ago
This is such a common thing. STEM education needs to be more well rounded.
Saleh@feddit.org 1 month ago
Why? Idiots thinking they know more than they do won’t be stopped by this. Also if we wanted to round humanities and liberal arts by making it mandatory to pass analysis, linear algebra, organic chemistry and classical physics would just lead to much more people not graduating anything.
School is for a general education. Academia is for specialization.
prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 month ago
I can only speak for myself… But I had 2+ years at university before declaring a (STEM) major, allowing me to take courses in political science, history, etc., the difference is instantly recognizable.
So, as someone with a STEM degree, in a field of specialists who have zero understanding of the real world outside of their field, the difference is instantly recognizable.
The idea that a more well rounded education can ever be a bad thing is just straight up ignorant.
Saleh@feddit.org 1 month ago
Nobody is kept from taking additional education if they want to, like you did. But the general education should be from school and school education needs to define the standard of what everyone should know or should at least have known at some point so he or she can refresh upon it.
If you make it mandatory to make academic education contain every subject like school did, you will end up with programs taking 20 years instead of 5 years to graduate.